http://www.0xdecafbad.com/2009/04/better-xml-cdr-processing-for-freeswitch/ movl eax, 0xDECAFBAD Sun, 09 Oct 2011 01:27:54 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://www.0xdecafbad.com/2009/04/better-xml-cdr-processing-for-freeswitch/comment-page-1/#comment-195 trixter Thu, 04 Feb 2010 10:45:34 +0000 http://www.0xdecafbad.com/?p=28#comment-195 I do not know that there is any advantage to one vs the other. If you are processing the CDR records you will get the variables if they are from the XML CDR entry (not all CDR methods will have this ability). So it depends on what you are doing as to what the right tool for the job is. I do not know that there is any advantage to one vs the other. If you are processing the CDR records you will get the variables if they are from the XML CDR entry (not all CDR methods will have this ability). So it depends on what you are doing as to what the right tool for the job is.

]]> http://www.0xdecafbad.com/2009/04/better-xml-cdr-processing-for-freeswitch/comment-page-1/#comment-191 Diego Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:18:11 +0000 http://www.0xdecafbad.com/?p=28#comment-191 Cool, but what are the advantages/disadvantages of getting the CDR vars from the CHANNEL_HANGUP_COMPLETE event and getting/parsing it from the XML CDR files? Cool, but what are the advantages/disadvantages of getting the CDR vars from the CHANNEL_HANGUP_COMPLETE event and getting/parsing it from the XML CDR files?

]]> http://www.0xdecafbad.com/2009/04/better-xml-cdr-processing-for-freeswitch/comment-page-1/#comment-13 Shery Wed, 06 May 2009 15:07:29 +0000 http://www.0xdecafbad.com/?p=28#comment-13 Keep working ,great job! Keep working ,great job!

]]>